中国科学院物理研究所通过对嫦娥五号月壤样品展开分析，发现了不同起源的天然玻璃纤维苹果版inshot韩服。这种物质是由火山喷发、地质运动、陨石撞击等活动产生的玻璃物质，其形态有的类似于地球上的针状黑曜石、有的是球状、椭球状、橄榄状，还有气孔构造的胶结质，流体形态的喷溅物等。
苹果版inshot韩服，为何在美国的样本里没发现过？" >
美国提供给各个国家的月壤样本里都没有玻璃纤维
在美国赠送给各个国家的月壤样本里面，并没有发现玻璃纤维物质，这让很多科技博主开始怀疑美国提供的月壤样本是假的苹果版inshot韩服。
美国登月的地点全都位于月球的南极-艾特肯盆地，这个盆地是由陨石撞击形成的苹果版inshot韩服。月球上广泛存在硅酸盐，理论上陨石撞击的时候会产生大量的热，高温引起硅酸盐融化，就可能形成玻璃物质。但是，美国的样本里没有检测到任何玻璃纤维，就引起很多科技博主的怀疑，他们认为美国提供的月壤样本很可能是假的。
苹果版inshot韩服，为何在美国的样本里没发现过？" >
国外网络上无法检索到任何月壤里发现玻璃纤维的信息
如果美国提供给其他国家的月壤样本是假的，但是自己持有真的月壤样本，那么应该会有相关的研究成果苹果版inshot韩服。为此，我特地去国外网络上检索了一下相关的信息，没有发现此前关于月壤样本里有玻璃纤维的任何报道。
我检索到几篇学术论文，根据推测，猜想月球表面的部分土壤里，应该可以找到类似玻璃的物质苹果版inshot韩服。难道美国获取月壤60多年来，都没有做过月壤成分的分析吗？
展开全文
苹果版inshot韩服，为何在美国的样本里没发现过？" >
美国假登月的论点有哪些苹果版inshot韩服？
到目前为止苹果版inshot韩服，认为美国假登月的论点主要有：
1、 登月照片与当时可用技术的不一致苹果版inshot韩服。
2、 美国3名登月成员不愿意用手按着圣经发誓曾经登月过苹果版inshot韩服。
3、 美国登月照片中的光源与月球表面的光照不一致苹果版inshot韩服。
4、 登月照片中没有星星，很像摄影棚拍摄的结果苹果版inshot韩服。
现在又增加了一个：美国提供的月壤样本里，没有陨石撞击产生的天然玻璃纤维苹果版inshot韩服。
英文版：Natural glass fibers found in the lunar soil of Chang'e-5, why weren't they discovered in samples from the United States?
The Chinese Academy of Sciences' Institute of Physics analyzed the lunar soil samples from Chang'e-5 and discovered natural glass fibers with different origins. This substance is a type of glass material generated by activities such as volcanic eruptions, geological movement, and meteorite impacts. Some of them resemble needle-shaped obsidian on Earth, while others appear spherical, elliptical, or olive-shaped. There are also pore-structured cemented minerals, fluid-like ejecta, etc.
There are no glass fibers in the lunar soil samples provided by the United States to any country.
No glass fiber substance was found in the lunar soil samples provided by the United States to various countries. This has led many technology bloggers to suspect that the lunar soil samples provided by the United States are fake.
The landing sites of the US Moon missions are all located in the South Pole-Aitken Basin, which was formed by meteorite impacts. Silicates are widely present on the moon. Theoretically, when meteorites impact, a large amount of heat can be generated, causing the silicates to melt at high temperatures and possibly form glass materials. However, no glass fibers have been detected in the samples provided by the United States, which has raised suspicions among many technology bloggers who believe that the lunar soil samples provided by the United States are likely to be fake.
No information can be retrieved on international networks confirming the discovery of glass fibers in lunar soil.
If the lunar soil samples provided by the United States to other countries are fake, but they possess genuine lunar soil samples, there should be related research results. Therefore, I specifically searched for relevant information on international networks and did not find any reports on glass fibers in lunar soil samples.
I just found several academic papers through my search, which speculated that glass-like substances may be found in some of the lunar soil on the surface of the moon. Has the United States not conducted any analysis on the composition of lunar soil in the more than 60 years since obtaining it?
What are the arguments that support the claim of the United States faking the moon landing?
So far, the arguments that support the claim of the United States faking the moon landing mainly include:
Now there is another argument: there is no natural glass fiber resulting from meteorite impacts found in the lunar soil samples provided by the United States.
